25 Responses to “Throwback Tuesday: The Devil’s Advocate (1997)”

  1. rtm says:

    This movie left an impression surely, though I won’t categorize it as entertaining. I agree, this was one of Keanu’s best roles, and Charlize was pretty effective as the fresh faced small town girl. Her transformation throughout is heartbreaking to watch, I think she’s key in making this more than a suspense thriller but one that lingers in your mind and makes you think that evil is real… and it’s got the power of seduction like no other.

    The scariest part for me is actually the subtle scene where Mary Ann goes shopping with the rich lawyers’ wives and she saw a brief reflection of one of them in the mirror that revealed her true, frightening self. I jumped out of my seat every single time!
    rtm recently posted..Happy Birthday Sandra Bullock!

    Reply
    • Heather says:

      It does kind of get under your skin, and I think the brilliance of it is that you don’t anticipate it to do so. With Keanu and Pacino you don’t necessarily expect some of the subtle undertones that play out so nicely as you pointed out. Some of the foreshadowing is a bit obvious as well, but it’s damn fun and it’s ALL over the film when you re-watch it.

      Reply
  2. Rodney says:

    Great review, Heather, on a great film. I’ve watched this numerous times, mainly for Pacino’s mesmerising performance (is there anything this man cannot do?), and I’d also respectfully disagree with RTM’s comment above. I think Devil’s Advocate IS entertaining, it does exactly what its meant to do, and that’s shock, scare and make you think. Probably my favourite Pacino performance in modern times (or at least second only to Heat) and a genuinely creepy movie, which works on so many levels it’s scary!!!
    Rodney recently posted..Movie Review – Stand By Me

    Reply
    • Heather says:

      It comes off as a superficial film with seductive cinematography and Pacino’s over the top (in a good way) performance, but as you pointed out, there is a lot more to it than that. It’s an updated version of a lot of older horror flicks like The Omen or Rosemary’s baby, with the slow deliberate pacing, but in the end, it brings new innovation to the table, compelling characters, and most importantly is surprisingly creepy and scary!

      Reply
  3. Peter says:

    God, as much as keanu tried to kill this film with his awful, hackneyed accent and phony character-work, it still is a fun film to watch. Pacino gets to go off, which is always great to watch. I agree with your assessment on him here. Pound for pound, I still think he’s our greatest living actor. A nice ending here too.

    Reply
    • Heather says:

      I loved that Pacino just got to go crazy and it worked for him in this. He’s certainly one of cinema’s greatest contributors over time, and this is one of my fondest roles of his in memory, just because it was so right for him.

      Reply
      • Fitz says:

        Who else (besides Jack) could play Satan so convincingly?
        Fitz recently posted..

        Reply
        • Heather says:

          I know since the 90′s Pacino has gotten ripped for his yelling and screaming and bonkers performances, but it worked here, and Jack has until the last ten years or so been subject to his own stereotyping with roles, but I agree that the two of them are probably the best Satan’s ever ideally cast, with exception of Constantine. That was epic.

          Reply
          • Fitz says:

            Stormare rocked that role.
            Fitz recently posted..

  4. Bartleby says:

    Great review, Heather.

    Director Taylor Hackford would later get accolades for directing Ray, but I’m personally more fond of his work here and on Dolores Claiborne where he manages some very sinister atmosphere, mostly among mundane settings.
    I remember seeing this one at the theater in 1997, I believe it was back to back with I Know What You Did Last Summer.

    I didn’t care much for Summer, which seemed to rev up and then just stall, but Advocate creeps up on you, little by little. I think the production design is quite nearly the star of the show, with Pacino and Theron pulling in second place. Keanu isn’t great, but he does his job here. Whenever he’s placed in front of fantastical elements—an artificial world, or say, the devil—his blank slate registers confusion that kind of seems real considering the circumstances.

    Although I probably could have done without the ‘boo’ moments surrounding the demon faces and a little less of the lurid elements of the plot—they definitely add to the superficial nature of what is, at heart, a thoughtful story—I have to give everyone involved kudos for making something that sticks with you.

    That final scene, and Pacino’s line delivery, right before ‘Fade to Black’ starts up is one of my favorite endings in modern horror movies. They totally nailed that.
    Bartleby recently posted..Baltimore Bits-The binary suns set on The Senator Theatre one last time

    Reply
    • Heather says:

      I definitely agree there was a little cheese effect added, which is really the only thing that stopped me from giving this four stars (and Keanu’s in and out accent, but that I could have turned my head away from)but this was certainly one of the best movies in it’s genre in the 90′s, and is still incredibly enjoyable to watch.

      Reply
  5. I wanna make a Kai sandwich with the frizzy haired biatches in this film!
    Did you rewatch this cuz of THE GAME?
    Kai B. Parker recently posted..RANKING CHRISTOPHER NOLAN’S FILMS

    Reply
    • Heather says:

      It reminded me of it, and just thinking of the Pacino roles where his secondary half and “yelling” Pacino acting came through. Certainly one of my favorite roles of his in the last twenty years. And one of the few movies I really love Keanu in. Damn that Connie Nielson tripping me up.

      Reply
  6. CMrok93 says:

    The sets look great, but the whole ending had me turn my head sideways, even though this is a surprisingly good film.
    CMrok93 recently posted..8 Mile 2002

    Reply
  7. I turn this off whenever I see it because there are only three non-action flicks I can stand to see Keanu Reeves “act” in (Dangerous Liaisons, Parenthood and Something’s Gotta Give; in that order).
    Encore Entertainment recently posted..Literature Review

    Reply
    • Heather says:

      Andrew, give it a shot and Keanu some mercy here. He drives me crazy a good portion of the time too, but this and Constantine are well worth your time and energy and will make it to that short list, mostly because there isn’t too much acting required.
      Heather recently posted..DVD Review- Batman- Under the Red Hood 2010

      Reply
  8. says:

    Loved this and you can really see how Pacino revels in his role. It is perfectly cast and Reeves and Pacino work so well together. I thought it was thoroughly entertaining and the type of movie that I could watch again and again. I have to say though I didn’t necessarily find it scary or creepy like others.
    Olive recently posted..

    Reply
    • Heather says:

      I found the theme itself to be eerie rather than any individual event. One of those flicks that are more inclined to linger with you for some time rather than get you at the moment. But personally scary? I might agree with you there.

      Reply
  9. Steve says:

    I remember seeing this movie for the first time and saying to myself “Wow, Ashley Judd got really freakin’ hot!” It wasn’t until a week later that I realized my mistake. Could this have been Pacino’s last hurrah to be bellowing and menacing before it got all too familiar?

    Reply